Philosophy in relation to psychology Adam Mahrburg’s debate with Kazimierz Twardowski



Abstract

In 1898, „Przegląd Filozoficzny” („Philosophical Review”) published Adam
Mahrburg’s polemic with Kazimierz Twardowski’s text Psychology in relation to physiology and philosophy (1897), as well as response of Twardowski and Mahrburg’s
further polemic. In the background of this dispute were discrepant views on psychology, metaphilosophy and philosophy. Mahrburg, representative of critical positivism, supporter of Kantian agnosticism and Wundtian physiological psychology, didn’t understand Brentano’s program of empirical psychology, supported by Twardowski. Besides, Mahrburg had different views on philosophy’s function: for him philosophy was theory of science. Therefore he rejected both Twardowski’s idea of philosophy as a group of sciences and his specific concept of relations between psychology and philosophy.


Keywords

Adam Mahrburg; Kazimierz Twardowski; empirical psychology; physiologial psychology; metaphilosophy

J.W. DAWID: O wykładzie psychologji jako nauki doświadczalnej (z powodu „Poradnika dla samouków”). „Przegląd Filozoficzny” 1898, z. 3, s. 61-84.

R. KLESZCZ: Metoda i wartości. Metafilozofia Kazimierza Twardowskiego. Warszawa 2013.

A. MAHRBURG: [recenzja z: K. TWARDOWSKI: Psychologia wobec fizjologii i filozofii, Lwów 1897]. „Przegląd Filozoficzny” 1897/1898, z. 2, s. 71–79.

A. MAHRBURG, Odparcie repliki dra Twardowskiego. „Przegląd Filozoficzny” 1897/1898, z. 2, s. 149–151.

A. MAHRBURG: Podział i układ nauk. W: Poradnik dla samouków, cz. I. Warszawa 1901, s. XV–XLII.

A. MAHRBURG: Psychologia spólczesna i jej miejsce w systemie wiedzy. W: IDEM: Pisma filozoficzne t. 2. Warszawa 1914, s. 74-114.

A. MAHRBURG: Co to jest nauka. W: IDEM: Pisma filozoficzne t. 2. Warszawa 1914, s. 132-163.

W. RECHLEWICZ: Nauka wobec metafizyki. Poglądy filozoficzne Kazimierza Twardowskiego. Kielce 2015.

K. TWARDOWSKI: Psychologia wobec fizjologii i filozofii. W: IDEM, Rozprawy i artykuły filozoficzne, Lwów 1927, s. 3-32.

K. TWARDOWSKI: Odpowiedź na krytykę pracy pt. „Psychologia wobec fizjologii i filozofii”, podaną przez p. Adama Mahrburga. „Przegląd Filozoficzny” 1897/1898, z. 2, s. 145–148.

K. TWARDOWSKI: rec. z: A. Skórski, Filozofia jako nauka akademicka, „Ateneum” 1894, t. 4. W: K. TWARDOWSKI, Myśl, mowa i czyn. Część II. Red. A. BROŻEK i J. JADACKI. Warszawa 2014.

J. WOLEŃSKI: Szkoła Lwowsko-Warszawska w polemikach. Warszawa 1997.


Published : 2017-07-11


DziedzicA. (2017). Philosophy in relation to psychology Adam Mahrburg’s debate with Kazimierz Twardowski. Folia Philosophica, 38. Retrieved from https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/FOLIA/article/view/5204

Anna Dziedzic  anna.dziedzic@uw.edu.pl



The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.