Est-il possible de se mettre d’accord sur le sens à donner au terme de pragmatème ?

Krzysztof Bogacki
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-4276

Abstrakt

The term ‘pragmateme’ has been coined relatively recently and therefore its usage is still hesitant and its definitions lack precision. This makes it difficult to delimit the scope of all that relates to the intuition of the term. We believe that two criteria are crucial for the identification of the concept. First, it would signify an autonomous linguistic unit implying an act of enunciation, characterised by the adequacy between selecting an appropriate linguistic segment and its application, with all that it entails as constraints. This criterion derives from classical logic, based on the binary opposition of truth and falsehood. The other element of the definition of the pragmateme is difficult to apply due to its subjectivity. It can be described in terms of many-valued fuzzy logic. It requires that a privileged link be created in the consciousness of langage users between a particular formulation, conveying a given semantic content and other, competing formulations. Neither of the two criteria is correlated with formal exponents, which prevents them from being used in a database compiled for the purpose of creating a dictionary of pragmatemes


B l a n c o X., M e j r i S., 2018 : Les pragmatèmes. Paris, Classiques Garnier.

B o g a c k i K., K a r o l a k S., 1992 : „Założenia gramatyki o podstawach semantycznych”. Język a Kultura 8, 157—187.

D o s t i e G., 2004 : Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs. Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Bruxelles, De Boeck / Duculot.

K a r o l a k S., 2002 : Podstawowe struktury języka polskiego. Kraków, SOW.

K a r o l a k S., 2007 : Składnia francuska o podstawach semantycznych. Kraków, Collegium Columbinum.

K l e i b e r G., 1990 : La sémantique du prototype. Catégories et sens lexical. Collection : Linguistique nouvelle. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

M e l’č u k I., 1995 : ‟Phrasemes in Language and Phraseology, in Linguistics”. In : M. E v e r a e r t, E.-J. v a n d e r L i n d e n, A. S c h e n k, R. S c h r e u d e r, eds. : Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. Hillsdale (New Jersey), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 167—232.

M e l’č u k I., 1998 : ‟Collocations and Lexical Functions”. In: A.P. C o w i e, ed.: Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, (Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology). Oxford University Press, 79—100.

M o r r i s C.W., 1938 : Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

P a i k W., L i d d y E., Yu E., M c K e n n a M., 1996 : ‟Categorizing and standardizing proper nouns for efficient information retrieval”. In: B. B o g u r a e v, J. P u s t e j o v s k y, eds. : Corpus processing for lexical acquisition. MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA, 61—73.

P e i r c e C.S., 1931—1958 : The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. H a r t sh o r n e, P. We i s s, eds. (Vols. 1—6) and A. B u r k s, ed. (Vols. 7—8). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

S a r f a t i G.-E., 1997 : Eléments d’analyse du discours. Paris, Nathan.

S e k i n e S., N o b a t a C., 2004 : ‟Definition, Dictionary and Tagger for Extended Named Entities”. In: Forth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Lisbonne, 1977—1980.

S e k i n e S., S u d o K., N o b a t a C., 2002 : ‟Extended named entity hierarchy”. In: The Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Iles Canaries.

Vo r o b e y M., 2011 : ‟French-Spanish-Russian pragmatemes dictionary”. In: I. B o g u s l a v s k y, L. Wa n n e r, eds. : Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory. [Recurso electrónico]: Barcelona.

W i e r z b i c k a A., 2000 : ‟The semantics of human facial expressions”. Pragmatics & Cognition 8, issue 1, 147—183.

Z a d e h L.A., 1965a : “Fuzzy sets”. Information and Control, 8, no. 3, 338—353.

Z a d e h L.A., 1965b : “Fuzzy sets and systems”. In: J. F o x, ed.: System Theory. Brooklyn, NY: Polytechnic Press, 9—39.

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/arrete/2002/7/31/EQUS0201362A/jo/article_10 (consulté le 16 décembre 2019).


Opublikowane : 2020-12-23


BogackiK. (2020). Est-il possible de se mettre d’accord sur le sens à donner au terme de pragmatème ?. Neophilologica, 32, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.31261/NEO.2020.32.04

Krzysztof Bogacki 
Uniwersytet Warszawski  Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-4276