Społeczne postrzeganie instytucji recall i weta ludowego w warunkach polskich



Abstract

The social reception of recall and people’s veto among Polish electorate

The institutions of direct democracy seem to be crucial for effective functioning of political system. The inclusion of citizens in decision-making process ensures that political representatives remain accountable throughout their term and must be responsive to the wishes of the voters. The empirical research conducted by the author proves that prevalent portion of electorate expects the introduction of recall and people's veto to Polish law. The results of analysis confirm the high level of citizens' support for institutions of direct democracy. This support is articulated by all groups of Polish electorate, regar- dless of party affiliation and ideological viewpoints.

Key words:
direct democracy, recall, people’s veto, social reception, Polish electorate


Abbott F.F. (1915), The Referendum and the Recall Among the Ancient Romans, “The Sewanee Review”, January 1915.

Cronin T.E. (1999), Direct democracy. The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cześnik M., Markowski R. (2012), Wybory parlamentarne w 2011 roku – kontynuacja i zmiana, „Studia Polityczne” 2012, nr 29: 285-310.

Direct Democracy – The International IDEA Handbook (2008), Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Jabłoński M. (2002), Referendum i inne instytucje demokracji bezpośredniej, „Przegląd Prawa i Administracji”, tom LI.

Jakubiak Ł. (2011), Instytucja recall w Kolumbii Brytyjskiej na tle wzorca amerykańskiego, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2011, nr 4(105).

Jakubiak Ł. (2014), Instytucja recall w amerykańskim prawodawstwie stanowym, [w:] Paweł Laidler, Jarosław Szymanek (red.), Idee, instytucje i praktyka ustrojowa Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Marmola M. (2014), Porównanie skuteczności referendum lokalnych w sprawie odwołania organów samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce i województwie śląskim, „Vademecum Śląsk”, nr 2.

Musiał-Karg M. (2012), Elektroniczne referendum w Szwajcarii, Wybrane kierunki zmian helweckiej demokracji bezpośredniej, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM.

Olejniczak-Szałowska E. (2002), Referendum lokalne w świetle orzecznictwa polskiego, Warszawa: Difin.

Opinie o działalności parlamentu, prezydenta i PKW, Komunikat z badań 2015, nr 59, Warszawa: Centrum Badań Opinii Społecznej.

Recall of State Officials, National Conference of State Legislatures, http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/recall-of-state-officials.aspx (dostęp: 30.05.2015).

Sarnecki P. (1978), Rząd a parlament Konfederacji Szwajcarskiej, Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

Stosunek do rządu w kwietniu, Komunikat z badań 2015 nr 56, Warszawa: Centrum Badań Opinii Społecznej.

Twomey A. (2011), The Recall and Citizens’ Initiated Elections: Options for New South Wales, Constitutional Reform Unit Sydney Law School, Report No. 1.

Tybuchowska-Hartlińska K. (2014), Demokracja bezpośrednia na poziomie lokalnym: czy obywatele chcą partycypacji?, „Political Preferences” 2014, nr 8.

Uziębło P. (2009), Demokracja partycypacyjna, Gdańsk: Centrum Badań Społecznych.

Zimmerman J.F. (2013), The Recall: Tribunal of the People (2nd edition), Albany: State University of New York Press.

Zwierzchowski K. (2005), Amerykańskie instytucje demokracji bezpośredniej, Białystok: Temida 2.


Published : 2015-01-01


MarmolaM. (2015). Społeczne postrzeganie instytucji recall i weta ludowego w warunkach polskich. Political Preferences, (10). Retrieved from https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/PP/article/view/4278

Maciej Marmola  m.marmola@wp.pl



The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.