Party Behavior and the Formation of Minority Governments - Experiences in Denmark
In many modern democracies, the leaders who make important influential political decisions are highly likely to be party politicians or indeed party leaders. Very often they cannot prepare an adequate strategy for their political parties because it is usually impossible to find out all necessary elements for projecting the goals. It is not surprising that political parties are the most important organizations in modern politics and in the contemporary world, only a few states do without them. The reason that political parties are well-nigh ubiquitous is that they perform functions that are valuable to many political actors. Political parties play a major role in the recruitment of top politicians, on whom the momentous and painful political decisions often fall. With very few exceptions, political chief executives are elected on the slate of some established political party, and very often the head of government continues to serve as the head of the political party that propelled him or her into office. Democracy may be conceived as a process by which voters delegate policy-making authority to a set of representatives, and political parties are the main organizational vehicle by which such delegation takes place. The main aim of this article is focus on the minority government, which are especially common in the Scandinavian countries. They can be more easily formed and maintained where the party system makes it difficult to secure support for an alternative majority coalition to be formed, a vote of investiture is not required, and a government can stay in office unless there is an absolute majority against it. In the article will be emphasized some case studies of Denmark minority government formation and durability. General findings will be confronted with empirical data, which will allow to formulate conclusions about the specific of minority cabinet in Denmark.
party leaders, minority government, coalition, Nordic States, Denmark, party behavior, elections, majority, parliamentary members
Aldrich J.A. (1995), Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Armingeon K., Weisstanner D., Engler S., Potolidis P., Gerber M., Leimgruber P. (2011), Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2009, Institute of Political Science: University of Berne, Time.
Bille L. (1997), Leadership Change and Party Change. The Case of Danish Social Democratic Party, 1960-1995, “Party Politics”, vol. 3: 379-390.
Courtenay R. C., Golder S.N (2010), Measuring Government Duration and Stability in Central Eastern European Democracies, “European Journal of Political Research”, vol. 49 (1): 119-150.
Crouch D. (2015), Denmark Set for Liberal-Led Government After Rightwing Coalition Talks Fail, “The Guardian”, 26.06
Damgaard E. (1992), Denmark: Experiments in Parliamentary Government, [in:] E. Damgaard E. (ed.), Parliamentary Change in the Nordic Countries, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Damgaard E. (2006), Denmark. The Life and Death of Government Coalitions, [in:] K. Strøm, W.M. Müller (eds.), Coalition Governments in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
Damgaard E. Svensson P. (1989), Who Governs? Parties and Policies in Denmark, “European Journal of Political Research”, vol. 17: 731-745.
Herman V., Pope J. (1973), Minority Governments In Western Democracies, “British Journal of Political Science”, vol. 3: 191-212.
Kaarsted T. (1988), Regeringen, vi aldrigfik. Regeringsdannelsen i 1975 og dens baggrund, Odense: Odense University Press.
Katz R S. (1986), Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception, [in:] F.G. Castles, R. Wildenmann (eds.), Vision and Realities of Party Government, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Laver M., Schofield N. (1990), Multiparty Government. The Politics of Coalition in Europe, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Laver M.J., Budge I. (eds.) (1992), Party Policy and Governmental Coalitions, London: Macmillan.
Michels R. (1962), Political Parties, New York: The Free Press. First Edition 1915.
Mukherjee B., Leblang D. (2006), Minority Governments and Exchange Rate Regimes. Examining Evidence from 21 OECD Countries, 1975–1999, “European Union Politics”, vol. 7: 450-476.
Pedersen K., Bille L., Buch R., Elklit J., Hansen B., Nielsen H.J. (2004), Sleeping or Active Patners. Danish Party Members at the Turn of the Millennium, „Party Politics“, vol. 10: 367-384.
Pesonen P., Thomas A. (1983), Coalition Formation in Scandinavia, [in:] V. Bogdanor (ed.), Coalition Government in Western Europe, London: Heinemann.
Riker W. (1982), Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Sartori G. (1987), The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Schumpeter J. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper.
Strøm K. (1990), Minority Governments and Majority Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strøm K., Budge I., Laver M.J. (1994), Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies, „American Journal of Political Science”, vol. 38: 303-335.
Strøm K., Müller W.M. (1999), Political Parties and Hard Choices, [in:] K. Strøm, W.M. Müller (eds.) Police, Office or Vote? How Political parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas A.H. (1982), Denmark: Coalitions and Minority Governments, [in:] E.C. Browne, J. Dreijmanis (eds.), Government Coalitions in Western Democracies, New York: Longman.