Precarización del trabajo marítimo:  Caso de México. (1980–2006)



Abstract

On Precariousness of Maritime Labor.
The Case of Mexico (1980–2006)
Currently, the debate on employment and economic performance develops along the lines of two traditional approaches to labor. One side of the debate is represented by the ‘neoclassical’ promoters of the idea that the market is the only factor regulating relations between employers and workers; the other side is represented by institutionalists proposing models for reform of labor markets based on business productivity and competitiveness of nations. However, those occupying the middle ground integrate in their arguments both the need for economic efficiency and the need for social justice, recognizing that forms of state regulation and control in the labor market are necessary. Hence, also the situation of maritime transport is suspended between two systemic assumptions: first, that the regulation of maritime labor should be governed by international standards, with no institutional freedom for each country to design its own rules, and that it should be based on a general model ratified by most nations. Second, compared to the neoclassical model, the present day condition of the shipping industry testifies to the fact that the ‘lack of laws regulating competition is responsible for the serious deterioration of the working conditions’ and that it curtails the space of collective negotiations warranting the seagoing personnel acceptable working conditions. Such a shortage of international regulations renders healthy balance in labor relations impossible. However, despite the present-day diagnosis of the situation, the discussion on the likely paths for the development of labor regulations on board of merchant vessels tends towards arguments presented by the institutionalists, who advocate the need to establish forms of regulation and state control over the market and its players. At present, such a form appears to be the only one leading to the achievement of at least a measure of labor protection at sea. Today, the mechanisms of the market for maritime work impacting the living conditions of the personnel may be seen as exemplified by the phenomenon of the so-called ‘crews of convenience’, i.e.: crews hired under precarious working conditions, which the workers accept seeing no other alternative to unemployment. Such contracts, signed without government or union mediation, in the context in which no international fair trade laws respecting work at sea exist, reinforce the case for national and international regulation. The phenomenon of the crews of convenience and, generally, the intensification of the deregulatory tendencies in the shipping industry, point to the actual as well as potential role of trade unions in the sector. The globalization of shipping has taken unions, born in the context of state regulations, by surprise. The proliferation of free flag shipping and the consequent reduction of national fleets, caused by the liberalization of markets, resulted simultaneously in the increase of the number of sailors hired under substandard conditions and in the growth of the scale of the exchange of goods across the world. The deregulation in this sector allows for both phenomena to expand: on the one hand, it facilitates the free registration of vessels, it energizes the search for tax havens, but on the other, it fosters the free choice in hiring and firing crews and in pricing the freight solely on the basis of the market principles of supply and demand. Exemplifying the situation are the characteristics of the system of labor regulation in Mexico’s maritime labor law, which show that the actual dynamics of the labor market has been accommodated by the system’s flexibility. Yet, it must be noted that this flexibility of flags of convenience effectively undermines the safety of employment for Mexican sailors, because in the context of the reduction of the national fleet, given the precarious conditions of labor, crews must compete with Asians, who make up 80% of the global maritime workforce. To mitigate this situation, efforts have been taken by some nations to find a solution to the problem. Such efforts have been recorded by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Labour Organisation (ILO), who promote the implementation of international norms and standards of their application. As a result, the Maritime Labour Convention (2006), sponsored by the ILO, has become a milestone in the process leading to improvements in the international working environment. With its working documents amounting to more than 65 conventions and recommendations, its adoption in March 2006 and implemenation on August 21st, 2013, will continue to impact the lives of 1.2 million seafarers in the world, whose work makes 80% of world trade possible. Therefore, it is important to study the effects of the implementation of such regulations in the context of the actual work conditions on board of on ships since international organizations (such as the ILO, which seeks to curb casualization of employment through international rules that protect the interests of workers on board) became active in the process. In this context, the first part of this article illustrates how the merchant navies weaken in the face the processes of economic liberalization (which translates into working conditions on board). In the second part, this phenomenon is studied on the basis of the case of Mexico. Finally, the impact of the 2006 Convention, which aims to address the global maritime job insecurity, is analyzed, with particular emphasis on the prospective consequences of the systematic implementation of the Convention’s regulations of the Convention, whose cornerstone is the protection of the seagoing personnel, yet whose provisions meet with a serious degree of resistance on the part of the advocates of deregulation.


Cámara Mexicana de la Industria del Transporte Marítimo (2007) Informe de Actividades de la CAMEINTRAM,. Permisos temporales de navegación.

Castillo Ortiz, M. Á. (2008), ‘Navimin corre la suerte del Titanic‘ Reportaje de Revista T21.

Castillo Ortiz, M. Á. (2006), ‘Reporte Sectorial de la Marina Mercante’, Revista T21, 16.

Federación Internacional de los Trabajadores del Transporte (2006), Boletín de los marinos Nº 20.

Federación Internacional de los Trabajadores del Transporte (2007), Boletín de los marinos, Nº 21.

Federación Internacional de los Trabajadores del Transporte (2008), Boletín de los marinos, Nº 22.

Federación Internacional de los Trabajadores del Transporte (2009), Boletín de los marinos, Nº 23.

Federación Internacional de los Trabajadores del Transporte (2001), Una revisión de la Campaña BDC de la ITF, Oslo a Delhi. Londres.

Organización Internacional del Trabajo (2001). El impacto en las condiciones de vida y de trabajo de la gente de mar de los cambios en la estructura de la industria naviera. Ginebra.

Recomendaciones de la Comisión especial Independiente, encabezada por el Dr. Mario Molina Pasquel Henríquez.

Recomendación No.14/2009. Caso de la Plataforma Usumacinta de PEMEX en la Sonda de Campeche.

Reglamento Interior de la Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes (2009) Diario Oficial de la Federación.

Reglamento Interior de la Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (2009) Diario Oficial de la Federación.

Salgado y Salgado, J. E. (1997) Panorama del Derecho Mexicano. Derecho marítimo. México: Mc. Graw Hill.

Tapia Guerrero, L. A. (2002), Desregulación laboral en el sector de transporte marítimo en México: dumping social y crisis de la marina mercante nacional. <http://conocimientoabierto.flacso.edu.mx/medios/tesis/tapia_lares.pdf> .(consultado el 11.09.2012).

Tapia Guerrero, L. A. (2008), Estudio regional del mercado laboral para marinos latinoamericanos. El caso de México. <http://quipuojeda.blogspot.com/2010/06/estudio-regional-del-mercado-laboral.html> (consultado el 11.09.2012).

Download

Published : 2015-11-15


LópezA. (2015). Precarización del trabajo marítimo:  Caso de México. (1980–2006). Review of International American Studies, 8(2). Retrieved from https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/RIAS/article/view/3977

Alfredo Salazar López  asalazar@huatulco.umar.mx
Instituto de Estudios Internacionales Universidad del Mar Bahías de Huatulco Oaxaca, México  Mexico

Alfredo Salazar López—Profesor-Investigador, Instituto de Estudios Internacionales, Universidad del Mar, Bahías de Huatulco, Oaxaca, México. Abogado. Maestro en Ciencias Marítimas y Portuarias. Temas de publicaciones son: ‘Piratería Soluciones Globales para problemas Globales; Banderas de Conveniencia y Medio Ambiente; México Frente la ratificación del Convenio sobre Trabajo Marítimo; Justicia Universal en los Océanos; Artículo 32 Constitucional garantía de trabajo para los marinos mercantes. Delegado de México ante la OIT durante la redacción y adopción del Convenio sobre Trabajo Marítimo, 23 de febrero 2006.

Alfredo Salazar López is a Research Professor at the Institute of International Studies of the Universidad del Mar, Huatulco, Oaxaca, Mexico. As a lawyer, Alfredo Salazar Lopez holds a Master’s degree in Maritime and Port Sciences. The central themes of his publications include: ‘Piracy: Global Solutions to Global Problems’; ‘Flags of Convenience and Environment’; ‘Mexico Front: Ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention’; ‘Universal Justice in the Oceans’; ‘Article 32 Constitutional Guarantee of Work for the Merchant Marine’. Alfredo Salazar Lopez was Mexico’s delegate to the ILO for the drafting and adoption of the Maritime Labour Convention, February 23, 2006.





The Copyright Holder of the submitted text is the Author. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the RIAS websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Any commercial use requires separate written agreement with the Author and a proper credit line indicating the source of the original publication in RIAS.

  1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.

  1. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution - By the same conditions 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

  1. User Rights

Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

  1. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.