The Cultural Logic of America’s Pivot to the Asia-Pacific



Abstract

Lei Zhang
Renmin University of China
China

The past few years have witnessed the Obama administration’s rhetoric from ‘return to Asia-Pacific’ to pivoting/rebalancing toward Asia-Pacific’ under which a comprehensive package of political, economic and military moves has been implemented, signifying America’s endeavor to shift its focus from the Middle East to Asia-Pacific. However, the notion of ‘America’s Pacific Century’ by Hillary Clinton and the strategy of ‘America’s Re-balancing toward Asia-Pacific’ evade the persistently long history of America’s dominance in Asia and the Pacific and America’s cultural representation and construction of Asia-Pacific as one region. by reading Obama’s foreign tactics toward Asia-Pacific as literature and tracing the translation of America’s cultural literacy of this region into policy, this paper treats Obama’s pivoting/rebalancing toward Asia-Pacific as a cultural heritage and historical continuity rather than a gravity shift in America’s global strategy. That is, such political trope and actions need to be scrutinized from a historical and cultural perspective and the cultural logic behind deserves a careful examination. To do so, I would examine the hegemonic vision and free-trade imperialism, historically upheld and culturally shaped by America, in the very fashionable’ transpacific project promoted by U.S.-TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement) in the climate of globalization and transnational capitalism. Also, the discourse of sublimity and American Orientalism should be evaluated in the course of America’s ambitious political engagement and aggressive military deployment in this region. In conclusion, the cultural logic of the current U.S. foreign policy toward Asia-Pacific is inextricable from the Imperialist Imaginary, American Orientalism and American Sublime, all of which but not limited to, render this rebalancing strategy problematic. Rather than dealing with a rising Asia, particularly being anxious about China’s threat, America needs a critical self-reflexive examination of its imperialist culture which has shaped the Asia-Pacific Other and translated into its current foreign policy toward Asia and the Pacific.


Capling, A., and Ravenhill, J. 2011. ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: What Role for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement?’ The Pacific Review, 24 (5): 553-575.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09512748.2011.634078

Chen, K. 2007. ‘Taiwan as Club 51: On the Culture of US Imperialism,’ in R. Wilson and C. L. Connery (eds) Doing Cultural Studies in the Era of Globalization. Santa Cruz: New Pacific Press, 109-133.

Clinton, H. 2011. ‘America’s Pacific Century’, Foreign Policy <http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century

Connery, C. L. 1994. ‘Pacific Rim Discourse: The U. S. Global Imaginary in the Late Cold War Years,’ boundary 2 vol. 21, no. 1: 30-56.

<http://www.jstor.org/stable/303396> Accessed: April 5, 2013.

Dirlik, A. 1992. ‘The Asia-Pacific Idea: Reality and Representation in the Invention of a Regional Structure,’ Journal of World History vol. 3, no. 1: 55-79. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20078512 > Accessed: May 4, 2013.

Eperjesi, J. R. 2005. The Imperialist Imaginary—Visions of Asian and The Pacific In American Culture. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.

Eperjesi, J.R. 2011. ‘Jeju: From Peace Island to War Island,’ Asian Times Online. <http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/MH10Dg01.html> Accessed: September 8, 2013.

Fitzgerald, S. 2013. ‘Australia and China at Forty Stretch of the Imagination.’ First Published in February 2013 by Australian Centre on China in the World at the Australian National University <http://ciw.anu.edu.au/events/2012/fitzgerald/a-chinese-stretch-of-the-imagination.pdf> Accessed: September 8, 2013.

Hardt, M., and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kerry, J. April 15, 2013. ‘Remarks on a 21st Century Pacific Partnership’ <http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/04/207487.htm>

Klein, C. 2003. Cold War Orientalism Asia in the Middlebrow Imagination 1945-1961. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lieber, R. J. 2005. American Era Power and Strategy For the 21st Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lieberthal, K. 2012. ‘The Brookings Institution: Understanding the U.S. pivot to Asia.’ <http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/events/2012/1/31%20us%20asia/20120131_pivot_asia.pdf> Accessed: September 8, 2013.

Mackerras, C. 2013. China In My Eyes Western Images of China Since 1949. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.

Manyin, M. E., et al. 2012. Pivot to the Pacific? Obama Administration’s ‘Rebalancing’ Toward Asia. Congressional Research Service, R42448 <http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42448.pdf>

Obama, B. November 17, 2011. ‘Remarks By President Obama to the Australian Parliament.’ The White House Office of the Press Secretary. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament> Accessed: September 5, 2013.

Pan, C. 2012. Knowledge, Desire and Power in Global Politics: Western Representations of China’s Rise. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Pease, D. E. 2011. ‘Introduction: Re-mapping the Transnational Turn,’ in W. Fluck, D. E. Pease and J. C. Rowe (eds) Re-Framing the Transnational Turn in AMERICAN STUDIES. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press: 1-48.

Petri, P. A., et al. 2011. ‘The Trans-Pacific Partnership and The Asia-Pacific Integration: A Quantitative Assessment,’ East-West Center Working Papers, Economic Series, no. 119 <http://www.usitc.gov/research_and_analysis/documents/petri-plummer-zhai%20EWC%20TPP%20WP%20oct11.pdf>

Rotter, A. 2000. ‘Saidism without Said: Orientalism and U.S. Diplomatic History,’ The American Historical Review vol. 105, no. 4: 1205-1217.

Rowe, J. C. 2012. The Cultural Politics of New American Studies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ohp;idno=10945585.0001.001

Said, E. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.

Said, E. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.

Wang, N. 1997. ‘Orientalism versus Occidentalism?’ New Literary History 28 (1): 57-67. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/new_literary_history/v028/28.1wang_n.html

White, H. 2012. The China Choice Why America Should Share Power. Collingwood: Black Inc.

Wilson, R. 1992. ‘Techno-Euphoria and the Discourse of the American Sublime’, boundary 2 19 (1): 205-229. http://www.jstor.org/stable/303456

Wilson, R. 2001. ‘Doing Cultural Studies inside APEC: Literature, Cultural Identity, and Global/Local Dynamics in the American Pacific’, Comparative Literature 53 (4): 389-403. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593526

Zai Taiwan, S. 2011. Edward W. Said in Taiwan. Taipei: Yunchen Press.


Published : 2014-11-15


ZhangL. (2014). The Cultural Logic of America’s Pivot to the Asia-Pacific. Review of International American Studies, 7(2). Retrieved from https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/RIAS/article/view/4045

Lei Zhang  leizhangchina@hotmail.com
Renmin University of China, China  China

Lei Zhang is now a candidate for the master degree in English language and literature at Renmin University of China. His research interests include transnational/transpacific American studies, Asian American studies, Thomas Pynchon and Australian studies. He is also a member of Australian Studies Centre at Renmin University. His academic experiences and trips include (1) Co-presentation of the Power Shift from the West to the East at Yonsei Leadership Forum Northeast Asian Network—2009, Seoul, South Korea. (2) America’s Return to Asia-Pacific from the Perspective of Orientalism in 23rd Annual Graduate Student Conference, Honolulu, USA. (3) Jack Maggs: Construction of Another Series of History through Rewriting Literary Canon at the 13th International Conference of Australian Studies in China, Chengdu, PRC. His paper ‘A  Comparison between English News Captions and Chinese News Captions’ was published in a core Chinese Journal Journalism Lover in 2010.





The Copyright Holder of the submitted text is the Author. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the RIAS websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Any commercial use requires separate written agreement with the Author and a proper credit line indicating the source of the original publication in RIAS.