Humour in Professional Academic Writing


Abstract

Professional written academic genres are not typical sites of humour, especially in their final, published forms. In this paper, I argue that academic discourse as construed today not only does not preclude humour in written research genres but – in some text segments or in response to specific communicative needs – is perfectly compatible with it. In particular, I focus on these occurrences which engage the reader and contribute to the writer-reader rapport: humorous titles, humorous comments or asides, personal stories, and literary anecdotes. I also suggest that making university ESL/EFL students aware of the fact that “serious” writing tasks do offer some room for humour may draw their attention to the human face of academic writing, that is to the interactive, dialogic, and personal aspects of written academic communication.


Keywords

humour; English for Academic Purposes; academic writing; professional academic genres

Chiaro, D. (1992). The language of jokes. Analysing verbal play. London: Routledge.

Duszak, A. (1998). Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa. Warszawa: PWN.

Dynel, M. (2009). Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Fernández Polo, F. J. (2014). Native and non-native speaker interpersonal skills at conferences: Managing self-mentions and humour. In Łyda A., & Warchał, K. (Eds.), Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research (pp. 163–178). Cham: Springer.

Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., & Heydari, S. (2018). Humor-integrated language learning: A teacher’s and student’s perspective. TESOL Journal: e376. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.376

Hunston, S. (2005). Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in Applied Linguistics. In Tognini-Bonelli, E., & Del Lungo Camiciotti, G. (Eds.), Strategies in academic discourse (pp. 1–15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication, 18(4), 549–574.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 116–127.

Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, D. (2006). Humor in spoken academic discourse. NUCB Journal of Language, Culture, and Communication, 8(3), 40–68.

Martín-Martín, P., & Burgess, S. (2004). The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article abstracts. Text, 24(2), 171–195.

McMahon, M. (1999). Are We Having Fun Yet? Humor in the English Class. The English Journal, 88(4, March), 70–72.

Minchew, S. S. (2001). Teaching English with humor and fun. American Secondary Education, 30(1, Fall), 58–70.

Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35.

Nesi, H. (2012). Laughter in university lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 79–89.

Oxford Dictionaries Online. (2017). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ruiz-Madrid, N, & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2015). A multimodal discourse analysis approach to humour in conference presentations: The case of autobiographic references. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 246–251.

Skalicky, S., Berger, C. M., Crossley, S. A., McNamara, D. S. (2016). Linguistic features of humor in academic writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 248–259.

Solska, A. (2019). Puns as tools for teaching English grammar in a university context. In Gabryś-Barker, D. (Ed.), Challenges of foreign language instruction in the university context. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students. A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Tuncay, H. (2007). Welcome to HELL: Humour in English Language Learning. Online document. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499225.pdf. Accessed 30.11.2018.

Walton, D. (2007). Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download

Published : 2019-06-30


Warchał, K. (2019). Humour in Professional Academic Writing. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 5(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.2019.05.03

Krystyna Warchał  krystyna.warchal@us.edu.pl
University of Silesia  Poland




Copyright (c) 2019 Author and Journal (Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition)

The Copyright Holders of the submitted text are the Author and the Journal. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Any commercial use requires separate written agreement with the Author and a proper credit line indicating the source of the original publication in TAPSLA.