Brazil in the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA): The COVID-19 economic crisis and the possible new Labour Reforms
Abstract
In 2018, the Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA) of the International Labour Organization (ILO) released its Annual Report showing a puzzling scenario: around 50% of the complaints – 1,681 out of 3,336 – presented before the Committee since its creation have come from Latin America. If we analyse the last 10 years – i.e. from 2008 to 2018 – we find out a more astonishing situation: around 67% of the complaints – 477 out of 708 – came from Latin America. This Latin-American presence in the CFA may become even greater due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as economic downturns often impact labour rights. By the way, it was during an economic crisis in Brazil that the 2017 Labour Reform – symbolized by Law No. 13,467/2017, in force since November that year – was passed, remodelling some of the Labour Law pillars in the country. On the ILO Normlex website, we notice that three Brazilian complaints were sent to the CFA after November 2017: Cases No. 3327, 3344, and 3355. They may show us how freedom of association has been recently treated in diverse economic sectors, as well as sow the seeds of Labour Reforms amid/after the COVID-19 economic crisis. This article utilizes observational/exploratory methods to analyse these three cases, pointing out if/how the core modifications of the 2017 Labour Reform in Brazil connect with the debates in the selected CFA Cases. All in all, what about next Reforms?
Keywords
International Labour Organization; freedom of association; economic crisis; Labour Reform; COVID-19 pandemic
References
Case-law
CFA-ILO (2019). Case No. 3355 (Brazil), complaint date 09-APR-19, Sindicato dos Trabalhadores do Servicio Público Municipal de Campinas y CSPM, Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:50001:0::NO-:50001:P50001_COMPLAINT_FILE_ID:4001150 (access: 30 November 2021).
CFA-ILO (2020). Definitive Report, Report No. 392, October 2020, Case No. 3344 (Brazil), complaint date 03-DEC-18, closed, Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:50002:0::NO:50002:P50002_COMPLAINT_TEXT_ID:4059229 (access: 30 November 2021).
CFA-ILO (2021). Definitive Report, Report No. 395, June 2021, Case No. 3327 (Brazil), complaint date 08-JUN-18, closed, Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:50002:0::NO:50002:P50002_COMPLAINT_TEXT_ID:4111040 (access: 30 November 2021).
ILO (n.d.). Normlex, Information System on International Labour Standards, freedom of association cases, ILO, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:20060::FIND:NO (access: 30 November 2021).
Bibliography
Cavallini, M.: Nova lei trabalhista entra em vigor no sábado; veja as principais mudanças, G1 – Economia 2017, 10 November, https://g1.globo.com/economia/concursos-e-emprego/noticia/nova-lei-trabalhista-entra-em-vigor-nosabado-veja-as-principais-mudancas.ghtml (access: 30 November 2021).
CFA-ILO (2018a). Annual Report for the period 2018, ILO, https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/applying-and-promoting-international-labourstandards/committee-on-freedom-of-association/WCMS_706169/lang--en/index.htm (access: 30 November 2021).
CFA-ILO (2018b). Freedom of association: Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association (6th ed.), ILO, https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/subjects-covered-by-international-labour-standards/freedomof-association/WCMS_632659/lang--en/index.htm (access: 30 November 2021).
Edgar, T.W., D.O. Manz: Research methods for cyber security. Syngress 2017, https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128053492/research-methodsfor-cyber-security (access: 30 November 2021).
Freitas Júnior, A.R., V.R. Silva: Freedom of association in Brazil according to the International Labor Organization (ILO): Predicting Labor Reforms amid/after the COVID-19 pandemic [paper]. “Law and Society Association (LSA) Annual Meeting, online” 2021, 26–30 May, Chicago, USA.
Freitas Júnior, A.R., V.R. Silva: The Brazilian far-right populism and the ILO: Debates on social dialogue and political popularity [paper]. “5th Labour Law Research Network Conference (LLRN5), online” 2021, 27–29 June, Warsaw, Poland.
Freitas Júnior, A.R., V.R. Silva: Brazil in the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA): The COVID-19 economic crisis and the possible new Labor Reforms [paper]. “Young Explorers Seminar (YES!) Cooperante, online” 2021, 1–2 July, Lodz, Poland.
Reiter, B.: Theory and methodology of exploratory Social Science research. “Government and International Affairs Faculty Publications” 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/gia_facpub/132 (access: 30 November 2021).
Norms
Brazil (1943). Decreto-Lei nº 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943, Aprova a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho, Presidência da República, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Decreto-Lei/Del5452.htm (access: 30 November 2021).
Brazil (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988, Presidência da República, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm (access: 30 November 2021).
Brazil (1989). Lei nº 7.783, de 28 de junho de 1989, Dispõe sobre o exercício do direito de greve, define as atividades essenciais, regula o atendimento das necessidades inadiáveis da comunidade, e dá outras providências, Presidência da República, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7783.htm (access: 30 November 2021).
Brazil (2017). Lei nº 13.467, de 13 de julho de 2017, Altera a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (CLT), aprovada pelo Decreto-Lei nº 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943, e as Leis nº 6.019, de 3 de janeiro de 1974, 8.036, de 11 de maio de 1990, e 8.212, de 24 de julho de 1991, a fim de adequar a legislação às novas relações de trabalho, Presidência da República, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/lei/l13467.htm (access: 30 November 2021).
ILO (1919). ILO Constitution, Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:62:0::NO:62:P62_LIST_ENTRIE_ID:2453907:NO (access: 30 November 2021).
ILO (1944). Declaration concerning the aims and purposes of the International Labour Organisation (Declaration of Philadelphia), Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:62:0::NO:62:P62_LIST_ENTRIE_ID:2453907:NO#declaration (access: 30 November 2021).
ILO (1948). Convention 87, Freedom of Association and the Protection of the Right to Organise, Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312232:NO (access: 30 November 2021).
ILO (1949). Convention 98, Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining, Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB: 12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312243:NO (access: 30 November 2021).
ILO (1978). Convention 151, Labour Relations (Public Service), Normlex, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO-:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312296:NO (access: 30 November 2021).
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Brazil
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4006-627X
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
