Coverage of politics in Wiadomości TVP1 after the parliamentary elections in 2015: balanced or biased?



Abstract

Existence of free media is one of the most important feature of democratic system. Since the collapse of the communist system in 1990s, Central and Eastern European societies have been overtaken by a process of change. Media system change was part of the general process of what may be called systemic social transformation. The main goals of free media in Central and Eastern European were: introduction and legitimization of the concepts of democracy, rule of law and constitutionalism as much as concepts of political pluralism, competition and new political parties and candidates as legitimate competitors. Unfortunately in post-communist countries media have not yet reached a state of full independence from the current interests of political parties.

In this study there is case of Poland analyzed. After Polish parliamentary election in 2015 there have been changes in public television. The article presents the results of media content analysis of “Wiadomości” TVP1. In first research there is comparison how “Wiadomości” and “Fakty” coverage the same political events. In second research there is comparison how “Wiadomości” coverage politics in 2015 and after parliamentary election in 2015. The purpose of the research was to evaluate if the politics coverage became more balanced or more biased.

 

Key words:

media bias, coverage of politics, content analysis, eastern European media


Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2014). Party Colonisation of the Media in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest-New York: Central European University Press.

Curran, J. (2002). Media and Power. London-New York: Routledge.

Cushion, S., & Lewis, J. (2009). Towards a ‘Foxification’ of 24-Hour News Channels in Britain?: An Analysis of Market-Driven and Publicly Funded News Coverage. Journalism 10 (2), 131–53.

Dahl, R. A. (2015). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dz.U. 1993 nr 7 poz. 34. Ustawa z 29 grudnia 1992 roku o radiofonii i telewizji.

Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Reviewing key concepts in research on political news journalism: Conceptualizations, operationalizations, and propositions for future research. Journalism, 13(2), 139–43.

Gross, P. (2002). Entangled Evolutions: Media and Democratization in Eastern Europe. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hopmann, D. N., Van Aelst, P., & Legnante, G. (2011). Political balance in the news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 240–57.

Klepka, R. (2016). Analiza zawartości mediów: dlaczego i do czego można ją wykorzystać w nauce o bezpieczeństwie i politologii? Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia de Securitate et Educatione Civili, VI (224), 32–41.

Klepka, R. (2017a). Ewolucja Wiadomości TVP1: od medialnej stronniczości do propagandy politycznej. W: H. Batorowska (red.). Walka informacyjna. Uwarunkowania-incydenty-wyzwania. Kraków: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie, Instytut Bezpieczeństwa i Edukacji Obywatelskiej, Katedra Kultury Informacyjnej i Zarządzania Informacją.

Klepka, R. (2017b). Relacjonowanie prezydenckiej kampanii wyborczej w 2015 roku przez „Wiadomości” TVP1: zrównoważone czy stronnicze? Przegląd Politologiczny, (2), 157–75.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. ThousandOaks-London-New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Kurdupski, M. (2017). „Fakty” na czele oglądalności dzienników. „Wiadomości” straciły ponad 400 tys. widzów. http://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/ogladalnosc-programow-informacyjnych-lipiec-2017-wszystkie-serwisy-zanotowaly-spadki (10.11.2017).

Lauk, E. (2008). How Will It All Unfold? Media Systems and Journalism Cultures in Post-Communist Countries. W: K. Jakubowicz, & M. Sükösd (red.). Finding the Right Place on the Map: Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective. Bristol-Chicago: IntellectBooks.

Lisowska-Magdziarz, M. (2004). Analiza zawartości mediów. Przewodnik dla studentów: wersja 1.1. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

Markowski, R. (2016). The Polish parliamentary election of 2015: a free and fair election that results in unfair political consequences. West European Politics, 39, 1311–1322.

McNair, B. (2012). Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere. London-New York: Routledge.

Michalczyk, S. (2010). Demokracja medialna. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

O’Neil, P. H. (1997). Introduction: Media reform and democratization in Eastern Europe. W: P. H. O’Neil (red.). Post-Communism and the Media in Eastern Europe. London-New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Pisarek, W. (1983). Analiza zawartości prasy. Kraków: Ośrodek Badań Prasoznawczych.

TNS OBOP (2016). Wiarygodne informacje – czy są dziś w cenie?. Raport z

badań TNS OBOP.

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Houndmills- Basingstoke-Hampshire-New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (2005). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Mahwah-New Jersey-London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Roberts, C. W. (red.). (1997). Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences From Texts and Transcripts. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Part One: the contemporary debate. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.

Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediation of Political Realities: Media as Crucial Sources of Information. W: F. Esser, & J. Strömbäck (red.). Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Strömbäck, J. (2005). In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–45.


Published : 2017-12-20


KlepkaR. (2017). Coverage of politics in Wiadomości TVP1 after the parliamentary elections in 2015: balanced or biased?. Political Preferences, (17). Retrieved from https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/PP/article/view/6241

Rafał Klepka  rafal.klepka@up.krakow.pl
Pedagogical University of Cracow  Poland
doktor nauk politycznych, adiunkt na Uniwersytecie Pedagogicznym w Krakowie, zainteresowania naukowe: sposoby prezentowania wybranych procesów politycznych przez media, komunikowanie polityczne, wpływ mediów na zachowania wyborcze.



The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.