Odbiór emocji wyrażonych w prozodii u dzieci z uszkodzonym narządem słuchu


Reception of Emotions Expressed in the Prosy by Children with Damaged Hearing System
Hearing damage causes difficulties in perception not only of segmented speech components but also of suprasegmental structures. As a result, many functions performed by the prosody of speech, which are important for the understanding and interpretation of language communication, become unavailable to people with impaired hearing. The article presents the results of own research on perception of emotions encoded in the prosody of speech (happiness, sadness and anger) by children with prelingual hearing damage. The obtained results indicate that children’s ability to perceive emotions expressed prosodically is significantly reduced when compared with normal-hearing children’s. Difficulties in this respect increase proportionally to the hearing loss severity.
Key words: prosody, hearing damage, perception of prosodic phenomena

Bänziger T., Scherer K.R.: The role of intonation in emotional expressions. “Speech Communication” 2005, vol. 46, s. 252−267.

Bousten F.: Prosody: the music of language and speech. “American Speech‑Language‑Hearing Association Leader” 2003, vol. 5, s. 7–9.

Bouvet D.: Mowa dziecka. Wychowanie dwujęzykowe dziecka niesłyszącego. Przeł. R. Gałkowski. Warszawa, WSiP 1996.

Chatterjee M., Peng S.C.: Processing F0 with cochlear implants: modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition. „Hearing Research” 2008, vol. 235, s. 143–156.

Fuller C. et al.: Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear‑implant users. “Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology” 2014, vol. 15, s. 1037–1048.

Gaudrain E., Başkent D.: Factors limiting vocal‑tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations. “Journal of the Acoustic Society of America” 2015, vol. 137, no. 3, s. 1298–1308.

Geers A.E. et al.: Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school‑age children with early cochlear implantation. “Ear and Hearing” 2013, vol. 34, issue 5, s. 562–574.

Gilbers S. et al: Normal‑hearing listeners’ and cochlear implant users’ perception of pitch pues in emotional speech. “i‑Perception” 2015, vol. 6, issue 5, s. 1–19.

Gratier M., Devouche E.: Imitation and Repetition of prosodic contour in vocal interaction at 3 months. “Developmental Psychology” 2011, vol. 47, no. 1, s. 67–76.

Green T. et al: Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification. “Journal of the Acoustical Society of America” 2005, vol. 118, no. 1, s. 375–385.

Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S.: Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. “Journal of the Acoustical Society of America” 2004, vol. 116, s. 2298–2310.

Hopyan‑Misakyan T.M. et al: Recognition of affective speech prosody and facial affect in deaf children with unilateral right cochlear implants. “Child Neuropsychology” 2009, vol. 15, s. 136–146.

Jassem W.: Podstawy fonetyki akustycznej. Warszawa, PWN 1973.

Kwarciak B.: Początki i podstawowe mechanizmy świadomości metajęzykowej. Kraków, Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 1995.

Luo X., Fu Q.-J., Galvin J.J. III: Vocal Emotion Recognition by Normal‑Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users. “Trends in Amplification” 2007, vol. 11, no. 4, s. 301–315.

Meister H. et al.: The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal‑hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients. “International Journal of Audiology” 2009, vol. 48, s. 38–48.

Moore B.C.J.: Wprowadzenie do psychologii słyszenia. Przeł. A. Sęk, E. Skrodzka. Warszawa, Wydaw. Naukowe PWN 1999.

Most T., Aviner C.: Auditory, visual, and auditory‑visual perception of emotions by individuals with cochlear implants, hearing AIDS, and normal hearing. “Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education” 2009, vol. 14, no. 4, s. 449–464.

Nakata T., Trehub S.E., Kanda Y.: Effect of cochlear implants on children’s perception and production of speech prosody. “Journal of the Acoustical Society of America” 2012, vol. 131, s. 1307–1314.

Pakosz M.: Emotive intonation. Evidence from English. Lublin, Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej, Wydział Humanistyczny 1983.

Seidl A., Cristià A.: Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. “Developmental Science” 2008, vol. 11, no. 4, s. 596–606.

Sobin C., Alpert M.: Emotion in speech: the acoustic attributes of fear, anger, sadness and joy. “Journal of Psycholinguistic Research” 1999, vol. 28, s. 347−365.

Stickney G.S. et al: Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. “Journal of the Acoustical Society of America” 2004, vol. 116, no. 2, s. 1081–1091.

Van Zyl M., Hanekom J.J.: Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise. “Journal of Communication Disorders” 2013, vol. 46, s. 449–464.

Volkova A. et al: Children with bilateral cochlear implants identify emotion in speech and music. “Cochlear Implants International” 2013, vol. 14, no. 2, s. 80–91.

Wierzchowska B.: Fonetyka i fonologia języka polskiego. Wrocław, Ossolineum 1980.

Wilkinson E.P. et al: Voice conversion in cochlear implantation. “Laryngoscope” 2013, vol. 123, Supplement 3, s. 29–43.

Wysocka M.: Prozodia mowy w percepcji dzieci. Lublin, Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej 2012.

Wysocka M., Mackiewicz L.: Percepcja intonacji u dzieci z uszkodzonym narządem słuchu. „Logopedia” 2016, t. 45, s. 73–89.

Published : 2017-12-20

WysockaM., & MackiewiczL. (2017). Odbiór emocji wyrażonych w prozodii u dzieci z uszkodzonym narządem słuchu. Logopedia Silesiana, (6), 89-103. Retrieved from https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/LOGOPEDIASILESIANA/article/view/7306

Marta Wysocka  marta.wysocka@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl
Zakład Logopedii i Językoznawstwa Stosowanego, Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie 
Luiza Mackiewicz 
Centrum Kompleksowej Terapii Psychologiczno-Pedagogicznej dla Dzieci „Spektrum”, Grodzisk Mazowiecki 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.