CODE OF ETHICS
Publication ethics of Folia Philosophica
Folia Philosophica follows the rules and best-practice guidelines specified in the Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors published by the Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011 (download the PDF file).
Duties of the Editor
1) The Editor is responsible for the selection of articles for publication from among those submitted to the journal.
2) In making the choice, the Editor must not be guided by such factors as race, gender, sexual preferences, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the Author.
3) The choice of articles to be published in the journal is guided solely by:
- the value of the submitted text for the development of the research field and its fit with the scope of the journal;
- the originality of the text;
- the linguistic quality of the manuscript;
- clarity; and
- conformity with legal regulations concerning defamation, violation of copyright rules, and plagiarism.
Until the article is accepted for publication, the Editor or any other member of the Editorial Board shall not disclose any information concerning the submission to third parties, except to:
- the Author / Co-author;
- the Reviewers;
- members of the Editorial Board;
- the publisher; and
- copy editors, proofreaders, and printing technicians who prepare the volume for publication.
Confidentiality and competing interests
(To assess the possibility of competing interests, please consult the PLOS policy.)
Duties of the Reviewer
1) The Reviewer provides the Editor with relevant information on the basis of which a conscious decision can be made concerning the acceptance or rejection of the submitted text.
2) The Reviewer provides the Author with relevant information on the basis of which necessary improvements can be made to the manuscript, helping the Author to meet the highest standards of scholarly research or making it easier for the Author to write academic texts in the future.
3) The Reviewer provides the review on time or informs the Editor about any circumstances that prevent him or her from meeting the deadline.
4) In evaluating the submission, the Reviewer remains unbiased.
5) The Reviewer formulates his or her comments in a clear and unambiguous way.
6) The Reviewer should never argue ad-hominem.
7) The Reviewer should never make use of the review to boost his or her academic status or professional position.
8) The Reviewer will inform the Editor of any competing interests (to assess the possibility of competing interests, please consult the PLOS policy). In case of competing interests, the Reviewer will refuse to evaluate the submission and notify the Editor about the fact.
9) The Reviewer will treat all received documents as confidential.
10) The Reviewer is obliged to identify any cases of insufficient documentation of sources or suspected plagiarism and to notify the Editor about them.
Responsibility and duties of the Author
1) Authors submit manuscripts based on original research.
2) Authors present an accurate and detailed description of the research procedures applied.
3) Authors present data which are reliable and verifiable.
4) Authors provide complete and accurate references to all sources and works cited, including references to all other scholars and authors whose work has enabled them to write the submitted text.
5) Authors must not submit texts which contain falsified data or which distort statements of other authors.
6) Authors present an unbiased discussion of the collected data, based on a sound methodological background.
7) Upon the Editor’s request, Authors will submit raw data for verification by members of the Scientific Board of the journal, assisted by an expert in the field with which the submission is concerned. If necessary, Authors will consent to making these data public (provided that making them public does not violate the law and the Authors’ ownership rights and does not pose a threat to the safety of confidential data)
8) All submitted texts must be original and properly referenced, with all sources and cited works accurately documented, including texts that form the canon of a particular discipline and have influenced the final shape of the presented research.
9) Authors must not submit texts which involve plagiarism, whether this concerns undocumented translation, unreferenced quotation, or lack of appropriate reference to unpublished works of others, or ideas consciously borrowed from other scholars, including students, whose unpublished papers remain their intellectual property.
10) Authors are aware that plagiarism and data falsification are not only offences but also extreme cases of academic dishonesty and misconduct. Bearing this in mind, Authors take care to ensure that no element of their research may put their academic integrity into question.
11) Authors quote sources accurately, provide precise references to works by their mentors and other scholars, and document all data with references to reliable and verifiable sources of information.
12) Authors do not submit texts previously published – with the exception of copyrighted materials solicited by the editorial office if its members decide that reprinting them is important for the structure and thematic unity of the volume.
13) Multiple submissions, that is, submitting the same text to several journals at the same time, will be considered unethical. Therefore, Authors will not submit the texts they present to Folia Philosophica to other journals or volumes.
14) Authors who submit texts to Folia Philosophica retain the rights to their material.
15) Once the submission is positively reviewed, accepted for publication, and published, the Authors retain the rights to the published material and grant the right to use it to third parties, in accordance with Creative Commons License 4.0 International: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
16) Authorship is limited to individuals who have substantially contributed to the research and the writing of the text submitted to Folia Philosophica, be it in the realm of data collection, the idea of the study, the methodology applied, or the process of carrying out the research. All individuals who have contributed significantly to the study should be indicated as co-authors, irrespective of their academic status. This applies also to research assistants and students whose work was indispensable for carrying out the research or for writing the text.
17) Individuals who have not contributed to the work may not be indicated as co-authors.
18) Authors are obliged to disclose all cases of competing interests, especially financial interests, or other significant factors which might influence research results or data interpretation.
19) Authors will notify the Editor of any serious errors or inaccuracies which Reviewers or editors of the volume were unable to identify and will ask for an errata.
The rules above are based on: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011, March 7). Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors <http://publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct>